Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DER WIELE CHAIRPERSON LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL

VICE-CHAIRPERSON DULCE M. FULLER SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. REV. MICHAEL MURRAY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

STATE OF MICmGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR ALLY SON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONISTISECRETARY

www.adbmich.org

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

NOTICE OF DISBARMENT (By Consent)

Case No. 16-33-JC Notice Issued: August 10, 2016

David J. Anderson, P 27612, lansing, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Ingham County Hearing Panel #6.

1. Disbarment 2. August 10, 2016 Respondent was convicted in Michigan's 51 sl Circuit Court, by plea, for the felony of attempted child abuse, 2nd degree, in violation of MCl 750.13683. In accordance with MCR 9.120(8)(1), respondent's license to practice law in Michigan was automatically suspended effective January 7,2016, the date of respondent's felony conviction.

On March 22, 2016, the Grievance Administrator filed a notice of judgment of conviction. The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. 8ased upon respondent's conviction and respondent's admissions in the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel found that respondent engaged in conduct that violated the criminal laws of the state, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

The hearing panel ordered that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law in Michigan, effective August 10, 2016. Total costs were assessed in the amount of $828.47.

Mark A. Armitage

Dated: August 10, 2016

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.