Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DER WIELE CHAIRPERSON LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL

VICE-CHAIRPERSON DULCE M. FULLER SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. REV. MICHAEL MURRAY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONISTISECRETARY

www.adbmich.org

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

AMENDED NOTICE OF SUSPENSION WITH CONDITION (Pending Appeal)

Case Nos. 15-144-JC; 15-145-GA Notice Issued: August 29,2016

Alexander Melnikov, P 73960, Farmington Hills, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #67.

1. Suspension - 180 Days 2. Effective - August 19, 2016 Respondent was convicted, by guilty plea, of two counts of disturbing the peace (misdemeanors), in violation of MCl 750.170, and assault and battery (misdemeanor), in violation of MCl 750.81, in the Oakland County Circuit Court. Based on these convictions, the panel found

that respondent violated the criminal laws of the State of Michigan, contrary to MCR 9.104(5).

Additionally, based on respondent's default for failing to answer the formal complaint, the panel found that respondent engaged in conduct involving a violation of the criminal law, where

such conduct reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of MRPC 8.4(b); and violated MCR 9.104(2)-(4), and MRPC 8.4(a).

The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 180 days and that he be subject to a condition relevant to the established misconduct. Respondent filed a petition for review on August 18, 2016, but did not file a request for a stay of discipline. Total costs were assessed in the amount of $1,988.27.

~a~

Mark A. Armitage

Dated: August 29,2016

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.