Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DER WIELE CHAIRPERSON LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL VICE-CHAIRPERSON

DULCE M. FULLER SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. MICHAEL MURRAY

JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH

BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963·5553 I FAX: 313·963·5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMIN/STRA TOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY PARALEGAL

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTION/STISECRETARY

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION AND RESTITUTION WITH CONDITIONS (By Consent)

Case No. 16-4-GA Notice Issued: March 23, 2016

Mary S. Hickey, P 36942, Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #25.

1. Suspension - 90 Days 2. Effective March 23, 2016 The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. Based upon the stipulation of the parties and respondent's admissions, the panel finds that respondent neglected two legal matters, in violation of MRPC 1.1 (c); failed to keep her clients reasonably informed regarding the status of their legal matters and respond promptly to reasonable requests for information, in violation of MRPC 1.4(a); and, failed to refund an unearned attorney fee paid in advance in two matters, in violation of MRPC 1.16(d).

In accordance with the stipulation ofthe parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 90 days and that she pay restitution in the aggregate amount of $9,500.00. The panel also ordered that respondent be subject to a condition relevant to the admitted misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $793.71.

~aSb Mark A. Armitage

Dated: _NAR_. 2_l_Z_II _

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.