Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DERWIELE

CHAIRPERSON LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL

VICE-CHAIRPERSON DULCE M. FULLER

SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. MICHAEL MURRAY

JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

STATE OF MICHIGAN

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

SHERRY l. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRA TOR JENNIFER M. PETTY PARALEGAL

KATHLEEN PHILLIPS CASE MANAGER ALLY SON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST

www.adbmich.org

FINAL NOTICE OF SUSPENSION AND RESTITUTION Case No. 15-119-GA Notice Issued: May 27,2016

Satch U. Ejike, P 58701, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #72.

1. Suspension - 180 Days 2. Effective January 27, 20161 Respondent did not appear at the public hearing and was found to be in default for failing to file an answer to Formal Complaint 15-119-GA. Based on the testimony and respondent's

default, the hearing panel found that respondent neglected a legal matter entrusted to him, in violation of MRPC 1.1 (c); failed to seek the lawful objectives of the client through reasonably available means permitted by law, in violation of MRPC 1.2(a); failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, in violation of MRPC 1.3; failed to adequately communicate with a client, in violation of MRPC 1.4; failed to surrender papers or property or to refund the advance payment of a fee that has not been earned upon termination of the representation, in violation of MRPC 1.16(d); and, failed to answer a request for investigation, in violation of MCR 9.1 04(7), MCR 9.113(A) and (B)(2). The panel also found that respondent violated

MRPC 8.4(c) and MCR 9.104(1)-(3).

The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 180 days, retroactive to January 27,2016, the date of the interim suspension. The panel further ordered that respondent shall pay restitution in the amount of $4,000.00. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1,919.82.

Dated: ~M_AY_·_2_7_2_._· _

1 Respondent has been continuously suspended from the practice of law in Michigan since January 27, 2016. Please see Notice of Suspension Pursuant to MeR 9.115(H)(2) issued January 27, 2016.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.