Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS JAMES M. CAMERON, JR.

CHAIRPERSON LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL

VICE-CHAIRPERSON DULCE M. FULLER

SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D LOUANN VAN DER WIELE MICHAEL MURRAY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963·5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR JENNIFER M. PETTY PARALEGAL KATHLEEN PHILLIPS CASE MANAGER ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION AND RESTITUTION (By Consent)

Case No. 14-107-JC Notice Issued: April 14, 2015

Robert E. Siameka, P 20567, DetrOit, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline 80ard Tri-County Hearing Panel #11.

1. Suspension - 180 Days 2. Effective May 1, 2015 The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contains respondent's admission

to the allegations of misconduct contained in the Grievance Administrator's notice of filing of judgment of conviction, filed in accordance with MCR 9.120(8)(2), showing that on May 27,2014,

respondent was convicted by guilty plea of the misdemeanor offenses of larceny between $200 ­ $1,000 and breaking and entering without permission, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

In accordance with the stipulation ofthe parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 180 days, effective May 1, 2015, as stipulated

by the parties. The panel further ordered that respondent pay restitution in the aggregate amount of$7,800.00. Costs were assessed in the amount of $756.69.

~aZ# Mark A. Armitage}~ ~r"i\ "l 4 l015 Dated: ________

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.