Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS JAMES M. CAMERON, JR.

CHAlRPERSON LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL VICE.CHAIRPERSON SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D.

SECRETÁRY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D DULCE M. FULLER LOUANN VAN DERWIELE

MICHAEL MURRAY JAMES A. FINK

JOHN W. INHULSEN

STAITE OF MICHXGAN AtronNEY Dxs cIPLnNn

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 14IO

lBo,q.np

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-96s-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

SI-IERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

JENNIFER M. PETW PARALEGAL

KATHLEEN PHILLIPS CASE MANAGER

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASEMANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST

www.adbmich.org

NOTIGE OF SUSPENSION (By Consent)

Case No. 14-90-GA Notice lssued: February 12,2015

lssam A. Abbas, P 64657, Dearborn, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #10.

1. Suspension - Three Years 2. Effective January 30,2015 The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(FX5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. Based upon respondent's admissions and the stipulation of the partieå, the panelfound tñat respondent, in the course of his representation forthe ptåintif in a personal injury matter, failed to promptly pay or deliver any funds or other property that ihe client was entifled to receive, in violation of MRPC 1.5(bX3); failed to hold property of clients or third persons in connection with a representation separate from his own property, in violation of MRPC 1.15(d); violated or attempted to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, contrary to MRpC La(a); engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation where such conduCt reíeðts adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of MRpC 8.4(b); engaged in conduct that exposes the legal profession or the courts to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach, in violation of MCR 910aQ); engaged in conduct that is conträry to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals, in violation of MCR 9.10a(3); and engaged in conduci thai viotates the standardê or rules of professional conduct adopted by the Supreme court,

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.