Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. CHAIRPERSON LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL VICE-CHAIRPERSON SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D. SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. DULCE M. FULLER LOUANN VAN DERWIELE MICHAEL MURRAY

JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

STATE OF MICIDGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY PARALEGAL

KATHLEEN PHILLIPS CASE MANAGER

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND WITH CONDITION (By Consent)

Case No. 14-109-GA Notice Issued: January 7,2015

Scott W. Gross, P 43094, Macomb, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #101.

1. Reprimand 2. Effective December 30,2014 The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. Based on respondent's plea of no contest to the factual allegations and the allegations of professional misconduct contained in the formal complaint, the panel found that respondent had held funds other than client or third person funds in an IOL TA account, in violation of MRPC 1.15(a)(3); deposited his own funds into an IOLTA account in an amount more than reasonably necessary to pay financial institution charges or fees, in violation of MRPC 1.15(f); and violated or attempted to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, in violation of MRPC 8.4(a). The panel acknowledged that the Grievance Administrator had no evidence that respondent improperly used, commingled or misappropriated client funds.

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded and that he be subject to a condition relevant to the alleged misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $757.61.

~O(!?'20 al"kAArmitage

JAN - 7 2D15 Dated: ________

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.