Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS JAMES M. CAMERON. JR. CHAIRPERSON LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL VICE-CHAIRPERSON DULCE M. FULLER

SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D.

SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D LOUANN VAN DER WIELE MICHAEL MURRAY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226·3236 PHONE: 313·963·5553 I FAX: 313-963·5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTYDIRECTOR

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY PARALEGAL

KATHLEEN PHILLIPS CASE MANAGER ALLYSON M. PLOliRDE CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION (By Consent)

Case No. 14-124-JC Notice Issued: May 22,2015 Peter W. Macuga, II, P 2~114, Grosse Pointe Shores, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #7.

1. Suspension - 4 Years and 11 Months 2. Effective August 28,2014 1 The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admission that he was convicted, by plea, for obstruction of justice, a felony, in violation of MCl 750.505; and for impaired driving, a misdemeanor, in violation of MCl 257.6251. Based on respondent's convictions and his admiSSions, the panel found that respondent engaged in conduct that violated the criminal laws of the State of Michigan, contrary to MCR 9.104(5).

The hearing panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for four years and eleven months, effective August 28, 2014, as stipulated by the parties. Total costs were assessed in the amount of $770.07.

Mark A. Armitage MAY 22 2115 Dated: _______

1 Respondent has been continuously suspended from the practice of law in Michigan since August 27, 2014. Please see Notice of Automatic Interim Suspension issued January 2, 2015.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.