Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. CHAIRPERSON LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL VICE-CHAIRPERSON DULCE M. FULLER

SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D.

SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D LOUANN VAN DER WIELE

MICHAEL MURRAY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY PARALEGAL

KATHLEEN PHILLIPS CASE MANAGER

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST www.adbmich.org

FINAL NOTICE OF SUSPENSION WITH CONDITIONS (By Consent)

Case Nos. 14-65-AI; 14-120-JC Notice Issued: June 3, 2015

Derrick N. Okonmah, P 68221, Clarkston, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board TriĀ­ County Hearing Panel #69.

1. Suspension - 179 Days 2. Effective June 10, 2014 1 The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admission that he was convicted operating while intoxicated - third or subsequent offense, a felony, in violation of MCR 257.625. Based on respondent's conviction and his admiSSion, the panel found that respondent engaged in conduct that violated the criminal laws of the State of Michigan, contrary to MCR 9.104(5).

The hearing panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan .be suspended for 179 days, effective June 10, 2014, as stipulated by the parties. Additionally, the panel ordered that respondent be subject to conditions relevant to the admitted misconduct. Total costs were assessed in the amount of $801.69 .

.~~ Mark A. Armitage Dated: ...", -3 ..

1 Respondent was automatically reinstated to the practice of law in Michigan on May 29, 2015. Please see Notice of Automatic Reinstatement issued June 2, 2015.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.