Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. CHAIRPERSON CRAIG H. LUBBEN VICE-CHAIRPERSON SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D.

SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. CARL E. VER BEEK LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL

DULCE M. FULLER LOUANN VAN DER WIELE

MICHAEL MURRAY

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226ยท3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRA TOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY PARALEGAL

KATHLEEN PHILLIPS CASE MANAGER

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST

www_adbmich.org

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION Case No. 14-40-RD Notice Issued: July 22, 2014

Jess E. Forrest, P 68439, New Buffalo, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board. 1. Suspension - 180 Days 2. Effective June 20, 2014 Respondent was suspended by the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois for six months, effective February 7, 2014.

Pursuant to MCR 9.120(C)(1), proof of the adjudication of misconduct in a disciplinary proceeding in another state or a United States court is conclusive proof of misconduct in disciplinary proceedings in Michigan and will result in comparable discipline being imposed under subchapter 9.100 of the Michigan Court Rules, unless it is established that respondent was not afforded due process of law in the course of the original proceeding, or that the imposition of comparable discipline in Michigan would be clearly inappropriate.

On April 11 ,2014, respondent was ordered to show cause why he should not be subject to a reciprocal order of discipline in Michigan. Pursuant to MCR 9.120(C)(2)(b), no objections were filed by either party in response to the order to show cause and respondent was found to be in default, with the same effect as a default in a civil action.

The Attorney Discipline Board ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 180 days and that he pay costs in the amount of $1 ,508.87.

~.9~ Mark A. Armitage

JUl 2 2 201~ Dated: ________

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.