Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS THOMAS G. KIENBAUM CHAIRPERSON JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. VICE-CHAIRPERSON SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D.

SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL DULCE M. FULLER LOUANN VAN DER WIELE

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETIY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION WITH CONDITION (Pending Appeal)

Case No. 13-4-GA Notice Issued: May 20, 2013

Peter C. Mason, Jr., P 24259, Okemos, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Ingham County Hearing Panel #2.

1. Suspension - Two Years 2. Effective June 1, 2013 Respondent appeared at the hearing but was found to be in default for his failure to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on respondent's default and his admissions during the hearing, the panel found that respondent, in two matters, failed to hold property of clients or third persons separate from the lawyer's own property, in violation of MRPC 1.15(d ); violated or attempted to violate the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct, in violation of MRPC 8.4(a) and MCR 9.1 04(4); engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation where such conduct reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of MRPC 8.4(b); engaged in conduct that exposed the legal profession or the courts to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach, in violation of MCR 9.1 04(2); and engaged in conduct that is contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals, in violation of MCR 9.104(3).

The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for two years and that he be subject to a condition relevant to the established misconduct.

The Grievance Administrator filed a petition for review and this matter will be scheduled for hearing before the Attorney Discipline Board.

lAY 20 2013 Dated:___________

~------'- ------

­

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.