MEMBERS THOMAS G. KIENBAUM
CHAIRPERSON JAMES M. CAMERON, JR.
VICE·CHAIRPERSON ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D.
SECRETARY CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D
LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL DULCE M. FULLER LOUANN VAN DER WIELE
STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORIcJEY DISCIPLINE BOARD
JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT
211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROI1. MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHuNE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571 WWW.ADBMICH.ORG
NOTICE OF SUSPENSION WITH CONDITIONS Case Nos. 12-43-JC; 12-44-GA Notice Issued: November 27,2012
David J. Rubin, P County Hearing Panel #1.
St. Ignace, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Emmet
1. Suspension - 30 Days 2. Effective November 20,2012 Based on respondent's misdemeanor conviction of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of MCl 257.6251 C, and his admission that he failed to report his conviction to the Attorney Grievance Commission or the Attorney Discipline Board, the panel found that
respondent had committed professional misconduct. Specifically, the panel found that respondent had engaged in conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice, in violation of MRPC 8.4(c); knowingly disobeyed an obligation under the rules of a tribunal, in violation of MRPC 3.4(c)
and MCR 9.120; engaged in conduct which exposes the legal profession or the courts to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach, in violation of MCR 9.104(2); engaged in conduct that is contrary to justice, ethics, or good morals, in violation of MCR 9.104(3); engaged in conduct that violates the standards or rules of professional conduct adopted by the Supreme Court; in violation of MCR
9.104(4); engaged in conduct that violates a criminal law of a state, in violation of MCR 9.104(5); and violated or attempted to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, in violation of 8.4(a).
The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 30 days and that he be subject to conditions relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $2,172.20 ..
' , .
~ "
..'- ~ .