Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS THOMAS G. KIENBAUM CHAIRPERSON JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. VICE-CHAIRPERSON ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D.

SECRETARY CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL DULCE M. FULLER LOUANN VAN DERWIELE

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236

PHONE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION Case No. 12-50-GA Notice Issued: October 25,2012

James C. Hall, P 39216, Warren, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #108.

1. Suspension - Three Years 2. Effective October 24,20121 Respondent did not appear at the hearing and was found to be in default for failing to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on respondent's default, the panel found that respondent neglected a legal matter, in violation of MRPC 1.1 (c); failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness, in violation of MRPC 1.3; failed to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and comply with reasonable requests for information, in violation of MRPC 1.4(a); failed to explain a matter to the extent necessary to permit a client to make informed decisions regarding the representation, in violation of MRPC 1.4(b); failed to take reasonable steps to protect a client's interests upon termination of representation, in violation of MRPC 1.16(d ); failed to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client, in violation of MRPC 3.2; knowingly failed to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciOplinary authority, in violation of MRPC 8.1 (a)(2); failed to answer a request for investigation or complaint in conformity with MCR 9.113 and MCR 9.115(D), in violation of MCR 9.104(7); violated or attempted to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, contrary to MRPC 8.4(a); engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of MRPC 8,4(c) and MCR 9.104(1); engaged in conduct exposing the legal profession or the courts to obloquy, contempt, ensure, or reproach, in violation of MCR 9.104(2); and engaged in conduct that violates the standards or rules of professional responsibility adopted by the Supreme Court, in violation of MCR 9.104(4).

The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for three years. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1 ,742,50.

Dated:_____...;;;....=-_,....,.­

1 Respondent has been continuously suspended from the practice of law in Michigan since June 15, 2011. Please see Notice of Suspension, issued June 15, 2011. ~-- -­-----------

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.