Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS THOMAS G. KIENBAUM

CHAIRPERSON JAMES M. CAMERON, JR.

VICE-CHAIRPERSON ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D.

SECRETARY CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL

DULCE M. FULLER LOUANN VAN DER WIELE

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROI~ MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHvNE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION AND RESTITUTION WITH CONDITION Case No. 12-26-GA Notice Issued: November 14, 2012

R. Reid Krinock, P 36162, Brighton, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Washtenaw County Hearing Panel #4.

1. Suspension - 30 Days 2. Effective November 8,2012 The respondent appeared at the hearing but was found to be in default for failing to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on respondent's default, the panel found that he neglected a legal matter entrusted to him, in violation of MRPC 1.1 (c); failed to keep his client reasonably

informed about the status of his matter and to comply promptly with reasonable requests for information. in violation of MRPC 1.4(a); charged an excessive fee, in violation of MRPC 1.5(a);; failed to return his client's property and to refund any unearned fee after the representation was terminate, in violation of MRPC 1.16(d); engaged in conduct that exposes the legal profession or the courts to obloquy, contempt. censure. or reproach, in violation of MCR 9.104(2); engaging in

conduct that is contrary to justice. ethics, honesty, or good morals. in violation of MCR 9.104(3); and violating, or attempting to violate the Rules of Professional conduct, contrary to MRPC 8.4(a).

The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 30 days. The panel also ordered that respondent pay restitution in the amount of $400.00 and be subject to a condition relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1,767.97.

Dated:NOV 14 2012

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.