Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS THOMAS G. KIENBAUM CHAIRPERSON JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. VICE-CHAIRPERSON ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. SECRETARY ANDREA L. SOLAK CARL E. VER SEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D

LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL DULCE M. FULLER

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553

FAX: 313-963-5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION AND RESTITUTION Case No. 11-112-GA Notice Issued: April 4, 2012

Daniel E. Hunter, P 56222, Ypsilanti, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Washtenaw County Hearing Panel #4.

1. Suspension - Three Years 2. Effective April 4, 2012 Respondent did not appear at the hearing and was found to be in default for failing to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on respondent's default, the panel found that he neglected a legal matter, in violation of MRPC 1.1 (c); failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, in violation of MRPC 1.3; failed to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and comply promptly with reasonable requests for information, in violation of MRPC 1.4(a); failed to explain a matter to his client to the extent necessary for his client to make informed decisions regarding the representation, in violation of MRPC 1.4(b); failed to make reasonably diligent efforts to comply with a legally proper discovery request by an opposing party, in violation of MRPC 3.4(d); failed to answer a request for investigation, in violation of MCR 9.104(A)(7) and MCR 9.113(A) and (B); knowingly failed to respond to a lawful demand for information by a disciplinary authority, in violation of MRPC 8.1 (a)(2); engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of MRPC 8.4(c); engaged in conduct that exposes the legal profession to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach, in violation of MCR 9.1 04(A)(2); engaged in conduct that is contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals, in violation of MCR 9.1 04(A)(3); and engaged in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of MRPC 8.4(c) and MCR 9.1 04(A)(4).

The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for three years and that he pay restitution in the amount of $3,975.00. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1,741.72.

J

Dated: __________

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.