Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS THOMAS G. KIENBAUM

CHAIRPERSON JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. VICE-CHAIRPERSON ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D.

SECRETARY ANDREA L. SOLAK CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL DULCE M. FULLER

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313·963·5553 FAX: 313·963·5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF DISBARMENT AND RESTITUTION WITH CONDITION Case No. 11-117-GA Notice Issued: February 13, 2012 David R. Berndt, P41834, Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #22.

1. Disbarment 2. Effective February 11, 2012 Respondent did not appear at the hearing and was found to be in default for failing to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on respondent's default, the hearing panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct when he intentionally misappropriated client and third party funds, in violation of MRPC 1.15(c); failed to promptly pay funds that a client or third party is entitled to, in violation of MRPC 1.15(b)(3); knowingly made a false statement of material fact to a tribunal, in violation of MRPC 3.3(a)(1); failed to provide a full accounting upon request of a client, in violation of MRPC 1.15(b)(3); fai·led to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of the matter and failed to comply promptly with reasonable requests for information, in violation ofMRPC 1.4(a); knowingly misrepresented facts and circumstances surrounding a request for investigation, in violation of MCR 9.1 04(6) (formerly MCR 9.1 04(A)(6»; knowingly made a false statement of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter, in violation of MRPC 8.1 (a)(1); engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of MCR 9.104(1) (formerly MCR 9.104(A)(1» and MRPC 8.4(c); engaged in conduct that exposes the legal profession or the courts to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach, in violation of MCR 9.104(2) (formerly MCR 9.104(A)(2»; engaged in conduct contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals, in violation of MCR 9.104(3) (formerly MCR 9.1 03(A)(3»; violated or attempted to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, in violation of MRPC 8.4(a); and engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud and deceit, in violation of MRPC 8.4(b).

The panel ordered the respondent be disbarred from the practice law in Michigan and pay restitution in the aggregate amount of $11,718.84. The panel also ordered that respondent be subject to a condition relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $2,117.45.

olt ;' EB 132012·' Dated:__________

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.