Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS WIlliAM J. DANHOF

CHAIRPERSON THOMAS G. KIENBAUM VICE· CHAIRPERSON ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. SECRETARY WILLIAM L. MATTHEWS ANDREA L. SOLAK CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT", MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHuNE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571 WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE VACATING ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT (Pending Appeal)

Case No. 10-26-RP Notice Issued: September 21, 2011

Robert L. Wiggins, Jr., P 32359, Southfield, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board, vacating T ri-County Hearing Panel #81 's order of reinstatement.

1. Reinstatement vacated 2. Effective September 9, 2011 Petitioner's license to practice law in Michigan was suspended for 180 days effective May 16, 2009. His petition for reinstatement, filed in accordance with MCR 9.123(B) and MCR 9.124, was granted by Tri-County Hearing Panel #81, which concluded, by a majority, that petitioner had satisfactorily established his eligibility for reinstatement in accordance with those court rules. The

panel also issued an order of eligibility for reinstatement with two conditions to be met before petitioner could be reinstated to the practice of law in Michigan. The Board received written proof of petitioner's compliance with those conditions and an order of reinstatement with conditions,

effective February 24,2011, was issued by the Board.

The Grievance Administrator filed a petition for review and, after review, the Attorney Discipline Board issued an order vacating the hearing panel's order of reinstatement, effective September 9, 2011.

On September 12, 2011, petitioner filed an application for leave to appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court, as well as a motion for stay of suspension. On September 14, 2011, the Supreme Court denied petitioner's motion for stay. The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

SEP 21 ,·2011 Dated:, _________

--------~

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.