Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS JAMES M. CAMERON, JR.

CHAIRPERSON CRAIG H. LUBBEN VICE-CHAIRPERSON SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D.

SECRETARY ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D.

CARL E. VER BEEK LAWRENCE G. CAMPBELL DULCE M. FULLER LOUANN VAN DER WIELE MICHAEL MURRAY

STATE OF MICHIGAN

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963·5553 I FAX: 313·963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY PARALEGAL

KATHLEEN PHILLIPS CASE MANAGER ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST

www.adbmich.org

FINAL NOTICE OF DISBARMENT Case No. 11-95-RD Notice Issued: March 3, 2014

Michael R. Carithers, Jr., P 45614, Southfield, Michigan, by Attorney Discipline Board, affirming the hearing panel's order of disbarment.

1. Disbarred 2. EffectiveAugust17,2011 In a reciprocal discipline proceeding under MCR 9.120(C), the Grievance Administratorfiled a Petition for Order to Show Cause, accompanied by a certified copy of the Opinion and Order of

the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in Attorney Grievance Commission ofMaryland v Michael Robert Carithers, Jr., Misc. Docket No. AG 18, September Term 2010, disbarring respondent's license to practice law in the State of Maryland, effective August 17, 2011. The panel found that respondent was afforded due process of law in the course of the original proceeding and that respondent had

failed to persuade the panel that the imposition of comparable discipline in Michigan would be clearly inappropriate.

The panel ordered that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law in Michigan, retroactive to August 17, 2011, the date of his disbarment from the practice of law in Maryland. Respondent filed a petition for review and stay of discipline. The Board granted the petition but denied respondent's request for a stay of discipline. The Board conducted a review hearing and, on January 31, 2014, issued an order affirming the hearing panel's order of disbarment. Total

costs were assessed in the amount of $2,197.88.

MAR - 3 2814 Dated: ________

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.