Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS WILLIAM J. DANHOF

CHAIRPERSON THOMAS G. KIENBAUM VICE·CHAlRPERSON ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D.

SECRETARY WILLIAM L. MATTHEWS ANDREA L. SOLAK CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN

JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIREGOR

MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIREGOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

21 1 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226·3236 PHONE: 313·963·5553 FAX: 313-963-5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF REVOCATION AND RESTITUTION (By Consent)

Case Nos. 10-56-AI; 10-106-JC Notice Issued: January 12, 2011

William A. Garrett, P 13859, Sylvania, Ohio, by the Attorney Discipline 80ard Tri-County Hearing Panel #2.

1 . Revocation 2. Effective May 19, 20101 Respondent was convicted in the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas in Toledo, Ohio, oftwo counts offelony Grand Theft, in violation.of R.C. 2913.02(A)(2) & (8)(2). In accordance with MCR 9.120(8)(1), respondent's license to practice law in Michigan is suspended effective May 19, 2010, the date of his felony conviction.

The respondent and Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for consent order of discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The panel found that, based on his felony convictions, respondent had committed professional misconduct in violation of MCR 9.1 04(A)(5).

In accordance with the stipulation ofthe parties, the panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be revoked, effective May 19, 2010, and that he pay restitution in the aggregate amount of $16,767.00. Costs were assessed in the amount of $755.54.

John F. Van 80lt JAN 12 2011 Dated: _______

1 Respondent has been continuously suspended from the practice of law in Michigan since May 19, 2010. Please see Notice of Automatic Interim Suspension issued May 25,2010.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.