Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS WILLIAM J. DANHOF

CHAIRPERSON THOMAS G. KIENBAUM VICE-CHAJRPERSON WILLIAM L. MATTHEWS, CPA

SECRETARY ANDREA L. SOLAK ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN

JAMES M. CAMERON, JR. SYLVIA P. WHITMER, Ph.D

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION Case No. 06-50-GA Notice Issued: October 5,2009

Sue E. Radulovich, P 33346, Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #2.

1. Suspension - 120 Days 2. Effective October 3,2009 The hearing panel found that respondent knowingly disobeyed an obligation under the rules of a tribunal and brought a proceeding in which there was no basis for doing so that was not frivolous. Respondent's conduct was found to be in violation ofMCR 9.1 04(A)(1 )-(4); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 3.1; 3.4(c); and 8.4(a) and (c);

The hearing panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 120 days. Respondent filed a petition for review, along with a request for stay of discipline. The stay was granted and, upon review, the Attorney Discipline Board issued its order and Opinion affirming the hearing panel's order of suspension

Respondent filed a motion for reconsideration, and on April 15, 2008, the Board issued an order seeking clarification. On March 11, 2009, the Board denied respondent's motion for reconsideration. Respondent then filed an application for leave to appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court which was denied on September 11 ,2009. Pursuant to the Court's order, the stay of discipline was extended 21 days, through October 2, 2009.

Total costs were assessed in the amount of $3,219.75.

Dated: OCT - 52001

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.