Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS WILLIAM J. DANHOF

CHAIRPERSON THOMAS G. KIENBAUM VICE-CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM L. MATTHEWS, CPA

SECRETARY BILLY BEN BAUMANN, M.D. ANDREA L. SOLAK ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN JAMES M. CAMERON, JR.

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETIY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571 WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND AND RESTITUTION WITH CONDITION Case No. 08-115-GA Notice Issued: March 2, 2009

Robert C. Buschmohle, P 54192, Roseville, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board, Tri-County Hearing Panel #101

1. Reprimand 2. Effective February 28, 2009 The respondent was found to be in default for failing to file an answer to the formal complaint, but he -did appear at the hearing. While the allegations in the formal complaint were deemed to be admitted by respondent's default, the hearing panel found that the record did not provide a sufficient basis for finding that respondent had committed all of the professional misconduct alleged in the formal complaint. Based on the evidence submitted, the panel found that respondent failed to keep a client reasonably informed; failed to refund an unearned fee; engaged in conduct that exposes the legal profession to obloquy, contempt, censure or reproach; failed to file a timely answer to a request for investigation; and failed to respond to the Grievance Administrator's lawful demands for information. Respondent's conduct was in violation ofMCR 9.1 04(A)(1 )-(3) and (7); MeR 9.113(A) and (8)(3); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4(a); 1.16(d); 8.1(a)(2); and 8.4(a) and (c).

The panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded and pay restitution in the amount of $1,000.00. Respondent was also ordered to comply with a condition relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1,724.50 .

Dated:"

---------

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.