Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS WILLIAM J. DANHOF

CHAIRPERSON THOMAS G. KIENBAUM VICE-CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM l. MATTHEWS, CPA

SECRETARY BILLY BEN BAUMANN, M.D. ANDREA l. SOLAK ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. CARL E. VER BEEK CRAIG H. LUBBEN JAMES M. CAMERON, JR.

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571 WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND, PROBATION AND RESTITUTION (By Consent)

Case No. 07-170-PI Notice Issued: January 16, 2009 Deborah A. Dickson, P 39841, Inkster, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #6. -

1. 2. 3.

Reprimand Probation - 2 Years Effective January 9, 2009

The respondent and the Grievance Administr~tor filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5) which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. Respondent pled no contest to the allegations that she neglected a legal matter; failed to seek her client's lawful objectives; failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing her client; failed to keep her client reasonably informed about the status of her case and comply promptly with her reasonable requests for information; failed to explain the matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit her client to make informed decisions regarding the representation; failed to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of her client, in violation of MCR 9.1 04(A)(1 )-(3); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (c); 1.2(a); 1.3; 1.4(a) and (b); 3.2; and 8.4(a) and (c).

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded and pay restit~tion in the amount of $1,400.00. The panel also ordered that respondent shall be subject to a two year probationary period with conditions relevant to the admitted misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $863.11.

January 16, 2009 Dated: -----------

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.