Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS WILLIAM J. DANHOF

CHAIRPERSON THOMAS G. KIENBAUM V/CE-CHAJRPERSON WILLIAM l. MATIHEWS, CPA SECRETARY BILLY BEN BAUMANN, M.D. ANDREA l. SOLAK ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D. CARL E. VER BEEK

CRAIG H. LUBBEN

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT A MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHuNE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION Case No. 08-135-RD Notice Issued: December 16,2008

Robert E. Jones, P 31661, Allen Park, Michigan, by Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #21.

1. Suspension - 2 Years 2. Effective December 11, 2008 In an order entered September 2, 2008, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan suspended respondent, Robert E. Jones, from the practice of law before the United States District Court and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for a period of two years. In accordance with MCR 9.1 04(B), the hearing panel concluded that the order of the United StatssDistrict Court constituted conclusive proof of misconduct; that respondent was afforded due process of law in the course of the original proceeding; and that the imposition of identical discipline in Michigan would not be clearly inappropriate.

On November 19, 2008, the hearing panel ordered the suspension of respondent's license to practice law in Michigan for a period of two years, commencing December 11 ,2008. Because the reciprocal discipline proceeding is consolidated with the pending matter of Grievance Administrator v Robert E. Jones, ADB Case No. 08-07-GA, the order of suspension was entered on an interim basis pending the panel's decision on the charges of misconduct in the consolidated matter and, if applicable, the panel's determination of an appropriate sanction for the misconduct charged in that case. Costs in accordance with MCR 9.128 will be assessed in the hearing panel's final order.

Dated:': BEC 16 2008

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.