Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LORI McALLISTER

CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM J. DANHOF

VICE-CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM l. MATTHEWS, CPA

SECRETARY GEORGE H. LENNON BILLY BEN BAUMANN, M.D. HON. RICHARD F. SUHRHEINRICH ANDREA l. SOLAK THOMAS G. KIENBAUM EILEEN LAPPIN WEISER

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT A MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHuNE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571 WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF REVOCATION AND RESTITUTION (Pending Appeal)

Case No. 07-103-GA Notice Issued: March 28, 2008 George V. Warren, P 21996, Potterville, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Ingham County Hearing Panel #4. 1. Revocation 2. Effective March 25, 2008 The hearing panel found that respondent, in an immigration matter, neglected the matter; failed to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of her matter; failed to communicate with his client to the extent reasonably necessary for his client to make informed decisions regarding the representation; failed to seek the lawful objectives of his client; failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing ·his client; failed to return an advance payment of a fee that had not been earned; failed to deposit client funds into a client trust account; misappropriated client monies and engaged in conduct involving misrepresentation; knowingly made a false statement of material fact to the Grievance Administrator; failed to respond to the lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority; made a knowing misrepresentation of a fact or circumstance surrounding a request for investigation; and engaged in conduct involving misrepresentation, in violation of MeR 9.1 04(A)(1 )-(4) and (6); and Michigan Rules of Professional

Conduct 1.1(c); 1.2(a); 1.3; 1.4(a) and (b); 1.15(a); 1.16(d); 8.1(a)(1)-(2); and 8.4(a)-(c).

The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be revoked and that he pay restitution in the amount of $1,060.00.

Respondent filed a timely petition for review and for a stay of discipline. On March 17, 2008, the Attorney Discipline Board scheduled the matter for a review hearing but denied respondent's petition for a stay of discipline.

John F. Van Bolt MAR 18 2008 Dated: -------

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.