Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LORI McALLISTER

CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM J. DANHOF VICE-CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM l. MATTHEWS, CPA

SECRETARY GEORGE H. LENNON BILLY BEN BAUMANN, M.D. HON. RICHARD F. SUHRHEINRICH ANDREA l. SOLAK THOMAS G. KIENBAUM EILEEN LAPPIN WEISER

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

MARKA. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571 WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION AND RESTITUTION WITH CONDITIONS (Pending Appeal)

Case No: 07-133-GA Notice Issued: March 11,2008 Barbara E. Maurer, P 41925, Midland, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Tri-Valley Hearing Panel #3.

1. Suspension - 45 Days 2. Effective March 11, 2008 The respondent appeared at the hearing but was found to be in default for her failure to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on that default, the panel found that respondent neglected three matters; failed to seek the lawful objectives of her client; failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness; failed to keep her clients reasonably informed about the status of their matters; failed to hold property of her clients or third persons separate from her own and in an IOlTA; failed to promptly deliver funds to a third party; misappropriated client or third-

party funds; failed to refund an unearned fee; charged an excessive fee for closing a file; knowingly failed to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority; and failed to answer three requests for information.

Respondent's conduct was in violation of MCR 9.1 04(A)(1 )(4) and (7); MCR 9.113(A); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (c); 1.2(a); 1.3; 1.4(a); 1.15(a)-(d); 1.16(d); 8.1 (a)(2); and 8.4(a)-(c).

The hearing panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 45 days and that she pay restitution in the aggregate amount of $3,300.00. The panel also ordered that respondent shall be subject to conditions relevant to the established misconduct.

The Grievance Administrator filed a timely petition for review which will be scheduled for hearing before the Board.

9!9f}~~ John F. Van Bolt Dated: MAR 11 '200B.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.