Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LORI McALLISTER

CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM J. DANHOF VICE-CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM L MATTHEWS, CPA SECRETARY GEORGE H. LENNON BILLY BEN BAUMANN, M.D. HON. RICHARD F. SUHRHEINRICH ANDREA L SOLAK THOMAS G. KIENBAUM EILEEN LAPPIN WEISER

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOlT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WESTFORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313·963·5553 FAX: 313-963-5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION (Pending Appeal)

Case No. 07-38-GA Notice Issued: November 28, 2007 James T. Macauley, P 31373, Lansing, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Ingham County Hearing Panel #7.

1. Suspension - 180 Days 2. Effective November 26, 2007 The hearing panel found that respondent, in a probate matter, handled the matter without preparation adequate in the circumstances; neglected the matter; failed to seek the lawful objectives of his client; failed to ace with reasonable diligence and promptness; failed to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of the matter and to comply promptly with reasonable requests for information; failed to explain the matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions about the representation; engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraUd, deceit or misrepresentation; engaged in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; violated or attempted to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct; engaged in conduct that exposes the legal profession to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach; and engaged in conduct contrary to justice, ethics, honesty, or good morals.

Respondent's conduct was found to be in violation of MCR 9.140(A)(1 )-(4); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (b) and (c); 1.2(a); 1.3; 1.4(a) and (b); and 8.4(a)-(c). The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 180 days.

The respondent filed a petition for review, along with a request for a stay of the discipline which was scheduled to commence on September27,2007. The Attorney Discipline Board granted a temporary 60 day stay of discipline and ordered that respondent's suspension would not go into effect until November 26,2007.

This matter has been scheduled for hearing before the Board on December 6,2007.

Dated:

_

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.