Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS WILLIAM P. HAMPTON CHAIRPERSON LORI McAlliSTER VICE-CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM L. MATIHEWS, CPA SECRETARY REV. IRA COMBS, JR. GEORGE H. LENNON BILLY BEN BAUMANN, M.D. HON. RICHARD f. SUHRHEINRfCH WILLIAM J. DANHOf ANDREA L. SOLAK

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN f. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIREGOR MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIREGOR JENNifER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST fORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PH6 NE: 313-963-5553 fAX: 313-963-5571 WWWADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION (Pending Appeal)

Case No. 07-04-GA Notice Issued: August 15, 2007 RobertJ. McQuade, P 40677, Centerline, Michigan, byAttorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #79.

1. 2.

Suspension - 180 Days Effective August 10, 2007

Based on respondent's arrest for possession of a synthetic narcotic and narcotic equipment, the Grievance Administrator alleged that respondent committed professional misconduct when he engaged in conduct that violated a criminal of a State or the United States; engaged in conduct that

involved dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation or violation of the criminal law; engaged in conduct that exposed the legal profession or the courts to obloquy, contempt, censure, or reproach; and engaged in conduct that is contrary to justice, ethics, honesty or good morals. Respondent filed an answer to the formal complaint but did not appear at the public hearing. Based on

respondent's answer, the Grievance Administrator filed a motion for summary disposition which was granted by the hearing panel, and all charges of misconduct in the formal complaint were deemed to have been proven. Respondent's conduct was found to be in violation of MCR 9.104(A)(2)-(5); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(a) and (b).

The panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 180 days. Respondent filed a timely petition for review and a request for stay of discipline. On August 10,2007, the Attorney Discipline Board denied respondent's request for a stay of discipline but ordered that the costs be held in abeyance. This matter will be scheduled for a hearing before the Attorney Discipline Board.

Dated: _A_UG_l_5_20_07_

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.