Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LORI McALLISTER

CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM J. DANHOF VICE-CHAIRPERSON WILLIAM L. MATTHEWS, CPA

SECRETARY GEORGE H. LENNON BILLY BEN BAUMANN, M.D. HON. RICHARD F. SUHRHEINRICH ANDREA L. SOLAK

THOMAS G. KIENBAUM ROSALIND E. GRIFFIN, M.D.

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

MARK A. ARMITAGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

JENNIFER M. PETTY LEGAL ASSISTANT

211 WEST FORT ST. SUITE 1410 DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 FAX: 313-963-5571

WWW.ADBMICH.ORG

NOTICE OF REVOCATION Case No: 07-34-GA Notice Issued: August. 27,2008 Harvey J. Zameck, P 22687, Southfield, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Tri-County Hearing Panel #60.

1. Revocation 2. Effective October 9, 2006 1 The respondent appeared at the hearing but was found to be in default for his failure to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on that default, the panel found that respondent neglected a legal mailer; failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness; failed to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a mailer; and failure to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority.

Respondent's conduct was in violation of MCR 9.1 04(A)(1 )-(4); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (c); 1.3; 1.4(a); 8.2(a)(2); and 8.4(a)-(c).

The hearing panel ordered that respondent's license to practice law in Michiga~ be suspended for 120 days, effective August 24, 2008.

The Grievance Administrator filed a petition for review, seeking an increase in discipline. A review hearing was held and the Attorney Discipline Board issued an order increasing the discipline from a 120 day suspension to a revocation of respon.dent's license. Additionally, the Board also changed the effective date of the discipline, making it retroactive to October 9, 2006. Total costs were assessed in the amount of $2,368.46.

Dated: _AU_G_Z_~7_Z_008

1 Respondent's license to practice law in M-ichigan has been continuously suspended since February 28, 2005. See Notice of Suspension issued March 22, 2005.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.