Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH CHAIRPERSON MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR. VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

KAREN D. O’DONOGHUE LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD MICHAEL S. HOHAUSER PETER A. SMIT

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

333 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1700

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL SHERRY MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONIST/SECRETARY

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3147

PHONE: 313-963-5553 š FAX: 313-963-5571

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION WITH CONDITIONS (By Consent)

Case Nos. 19-87-AI; 20-35-JC Notice Issued: June 8, 2020 Trevor Michael Salaski, P 74703, Southfield, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #63.

Suspension - 179 Days, Effective August 29, 2019. The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of a 179-Day Suspension With Condition, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent’s admission that he was convicted in a matter titled People of the State of Michigan v Trevor Michael Salaski, 6th Circuit Court Case No. 19-270850-FH, of operating while intoxicated/per se, 3rd offense, a felony, in violation of MCL 257.6256D. Based on respondent’s conviction, admissions, and the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct by engaging in conduct that violated a criminal law of a state, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent’s license to practice law in Michigan be suspended for 179 days, effective retroactively to August 29, 2019, the date of his guilty plea, which resulted in the automatic interim suspension of his license to practice law, and that he be subject to conditions relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $765.00.

/s/ Mark A. Armitage Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.