Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION AND RESTITUTION Case No. 95-118-GA Richard A. Neaton, P-26974, Port Charlotte, FL (formerly of Berkley, MI), by the Attorney Discipline Board modifying Tri- County Hearing Panel #58's findings of misconduct, ordering restitution and affirming suspension.

1) Suspension - four (4) years; 2) Effective June 1, 1995. Respondent was retained to oppose his client's extradition from England to Virginia on a charge of capital murder. Respondent represented the client at trial, in two appeals, and in a federal habeas corpus proceeding. The panel found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that respondent neglected the habeas corpus matter; made false representations to his client; affixed, or caused to be affixed, the signatures of two proposed expert witnesses on two affidavits without the witnesses' knowledge or consent; improperly affixed his signature as a notary on one affidavit; affixed, or caused to be affixed, a fictitious name as notary on the other affidavit; made a false statement in his answer to the Request for Investigation; and refused to honor his client's request that his entire client file be turned over, knowing that his delay would deprive his client of a prompt habeas corpus hearing. Respondent's conduct was found to be in violation of MCR 9.103(C); MCR 9.104(1)-(4)and(6); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1(c); 1.3; 1.4; 1.15(a)and(c); 1.16(d); 3.2; 8.1(a) and 8.4(a)-(c). The panel ordered that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Michigan for four years effective to June 1, 1995.

The complainant and the respondent each filed a petition for review. On July 9, 1996, the Attorney Discipline Board entered an order reversing the panel's dismissal of charges that respondent misappropriated $5,000 in client funds; directing respondent to make restitution to the complainant in the amount $5,996.50; and affirming the four-year suspension. Respondent filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied by the Board in an order entered August 26, 1996. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1,142.72.

NOTE: Respondent has been continuously suspended from the practice of law in Michigan since December 1, 1993.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.