MEMBERS REV. MICHAEL MURRAY CHAIRPERSON JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY
SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE
STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD
MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
WENDY A. NEELEY DEPuTY DIRECTOR
KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL
SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR
ALL YSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER
MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR.
LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD ANNA FRUSHOUR
333 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1700
DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226·3147 PHONE: 313·963-5553 I FAX: 313·963·5571
OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER
JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTION/STISECRETARY
NOTICE OF REPRIMAND WITH CONDITIONS (By Consent)
Case No. 19-39-JC
Notice Issued: July 2,2019
Reema Samman, P 69995, Rochester, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri County Hearing Panel #62
Reprimand, Effective June 20,2019
The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Reprimand With Conditions, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admisSion that she was convicted in (1) matter titled People of the City of Troy v Reema Samman, 52-4 District Court Case No. 15-002764-0D,o f the misdemeanor of operating while intoxicated, in violation of MCl 257.6251-A; and (2) in People of the State of Michigan v Reema Samman, 52-3 District Court Case No. 17-009410-SD; of the misdemeanor of impaired driving, 2nd offense, in violation of MCl 2576256-B and open container in vehicle, in violation of MCl 257.624-A; and (3) in People of the State of Michigan v Reema Samman, 52-3 District Court Case No. 175-008880-ST,o f the misdemeanor of failure to report an accident,i n violation of MCl 257.622.
Based on respondent's convictions,a dmissions and the parties' stipulation, the panel finds that respondent committed professional misconduct when she engaged in conduct that violated a criminal law of a state or of the United States, an ordinance,o r tribal law pursuant to MCR 2.615, in violation of MCR 9.104(5).
In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded and that she be subject to conditions relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $776.47. 2mmi e Executive Director