Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

NOTICE OF REVOCATION AND RESTITUTION Case Nos. 94-3-GA; 94-25-FA; 94-87-GA; 94-107-FA; 94-114-GA; 94-217-FA; 94-208-GA

Mark R. McCreedy, P-36256, Flint, Michigan, by Attorney Discipline Board Genesee County Hearing Panel #2.

1) Revocation; 2) Effective February 11, 1995. Respondent was retained by a number of clients in a variety of matters, including civil litigation, criminal appeal, child custody and visitation, bankruptcy, divorce, and civil rights litigation. The panel found, by default, the following misconduct: Eight counts of neglect/failure to communicate with clients; three counts of false statements to clients; one count of false statement to opposing counsel; two counts of failure to return unearned fees; two counts of failure to return client files; two counts of improper loan transactions with a client; five counts of failure to answer requests for investigation; and three counts of failure to answer formal complaints.

Respondent's conduct was found to be in violation of MCR 9.103(C); MCR 9.104(1)-(4)and(7); MCR 9.113(A)and(B)(2); Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1(a)-(c); 1.3; 1.4; 1.5; 1.7; 1.8(a)(1)-(3); 1.15(b); 1.16(a)(3); 1.16(d); 3.2; 8.1(b); and 8.4(a)-(c); and Canons 1, 6 and 7 of the then-applicable Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 1-102(A)(1),(5)and(6); DR 6-101(A) (1)-(3); and DR 7-101(A)(1)-(3).

The panel ordered revocation and restitution to two complainants in the total amount of $1,640. Costs were assessed in the amount of $682.32.

One of the complainants, to whom restitution was not ordered, filed a petition for review requesting restitution. That petition for review was dismissed due to the complainant's failure to file a brief in support of her petition for review and her failure to appear at the review hearing.

NOTE: Respondent has been suspended from the practice of law in Michigan since May 6, 1994, pursuant to the panel's Order of Interim Suspension issued on May 13, 1994.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.