Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION AND RESTITUTION Case No. 93-66-GA Michael J. Berezowsky, P-22800, Farmington Hills, Michigan, by Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #58.

1) Suspension - 120 days; 2) Effective March 5, 1994. Respondent was retained to represent a client in a custody/ paternity action. Respondent admitted that he failed to advise his client of a visitation order entered by the court; consented to an order requiring his client to pay weekly child support, without the client's knowledge or consent; failed to advise his client of the child support order, causing the client to be found in contempt of court for his failure to comply with the order; failed to keep his client reasonably informed concerning the status of his case; failed to informed his client of his suspension from the practice of law; remained attorney of record in the matter during the period of suspension; and wrote his client a letter during the period of suspension in which he held himself out as an attorney.

Respondent's conduct was found to be in violation of MCR 9.104(1)-(4)and(9); MCR 9.119(A); and the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct, 1.1(c); 1.2(a); 4.1; 5.5(a); and 8.4(a)-(c).

The Grievance Administrator and the respondent stipulated to a 120-day suspension to run concurrently with the three-year suspension ordered in Case No. 92-179-GA. The parties also agreed that respondent would make restitution to his client in the amount of $600.00. Costs were assessed in the amount of $118.86.

NOTE: Respondent's license to practice law in Michigan has been suspended continuously since February 4, 1992.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.