Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS REV. MICHAEL MURRAY CHAIRPERSON JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH

VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR.

LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD ANNA FRUSHOUR

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRA TOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONISTISECRETARY

www.adbmlch.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND (By Consent)

Case No. 18-93-GA

Notice Issued: November 29, 2018

Johnny L. Hawkins, P 48157, Southfield, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board TriĀ­ County Hearing Panel #74.

Reprimand, Effective November 24, 2018

Respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admissions to the allegations contained in the formal complaint that he committed professional misconduct during his representation of a client in a matter titled Tony Dewayne Beard, Jr., a legally incapacitated person, by and through Johnette Ford, his legal guardian v Eric Hawkins, US. District Court, E.D. Mich, Case No. 14-13465.

Based upon respondent's plea and the stipulation of the parties, the panel found that respondent failed to make reasonably diligent efforts to comply with a legally proper discovery request by an opposing party, in violation of MRPC 3.4(d). Respondent was also found to have violated MRPC 8.4(a), and MCR 9.104(2) and (4).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded. Costs were assessed in the amount of $757.83.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.