Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS REV. MICHAEL MURRAY CHAIRPERSON JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH

VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR.

I.INDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD ANNA FRUSHOUR

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226·3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE £EXECUTiVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMIN/STRA TOR

ALL YSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONISTISECR£TARY

ww.w adbmich.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND WITH CONDITION (By Consent)

Case No. 18-11-GA

Notice Issued: February 5,2019

Matthew Broderick, P 47403, Madison Heights, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #59.

Reprimand, Effective February 1, 2019.

The hearing panel dismissed Count One and Two of the formal complaint on petitioner's motion. Respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. Based upon respondent's admissions to count three of the formal complaint, and the stipulation of the parties, the panel found that respondent failed to hold funds other than client or third person funds relating to a representation in an IOlT A . in violation of MRPC 1.15(a)(3); failed to hold property of clients and third persons separate from hi s own property, in violation of MRPC 1.15( d); deposited funds into his lOlT A in an amount in excess of the amount reasonably necessary to pay financial institution service charges or fees or to obtain a waiver of service charges or fees, in violation of MRPC 1.15(f); and engaged in conduct in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in violation of MRPC 8.4(a).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded and subject to a condition relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $1,044.04.

Mark A. Armitage Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.