Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS REV. MICHAEL MURRAY CHAIRPERSON JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH

VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY

SECReTARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR.

LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD ANNA FRUSHOUR

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963ยท5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

ALLY SON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTION/STISECRETARY

ww.w adbmich.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND (By Consent)

Case No. 18-117-JC

Notice Issued: November 29, 2018

Michael D. Highfield, P 23683, Ann Arbor, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board Washtenaw County Hearing Panel #3.

Reprimand, Effective November 22, 2018

The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Reprimand, in accordance with MCR 9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel. The stipulation contained respondent's admission that he was convicted in a matter titled People of the City of Ann Arbor v Michael David Highfield, 15th District Court Case No. 17-0846-0D, of the misdemeanor of operating while impaired by liquor, in violation of MCl 257.625(1)(c). Based on respondent's conviction and admissions in the stipulation, the hearing panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct by engaging in conduct that violated a criminal law of a state or of the United States, an ordinance, or tribal law pursuant to MCR 2.615, in violation of MCR 9.1 04(5).

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded. Costs were assessed in the amount of $756.96.

/A /' i /':. l $1 d p. t * (..4 t ,, Mark A. Armitage Executive Director

, '--.g.

->-. ... -. ." , -

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.