Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS ROBERT S. HARRISON WAIRMAN

CHAIRMAN SECRETARY HON. MARTIN M. DOCTOROR REMONA A. GREEN PATRICK J. KEATlNG THEODORE P. ZEGOURAS

STATE OF MICHIGAN

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION ADB 226-87; 252-87 H a r r y A. Davis, Jr., P 33927, 1030 V At torney D i s c i p l i n e Board Oakland County Heari

SUlE 1260 O ~ 32 O 3 w I T M F . O I C R H T K S ~ TR A E Na E T g k m Code 3 13 963-5553

i t , M I 48213 by

1 ) Suspension - one year ;

2) E f f e c t i v e June 9, 1988. Respondent f a i l e d t o appear a t t h e hea r ing and f a i l e d t o answer t h e two c o m p l a i n t s c o n s o l i d a t e d f o r h e a r i n g . The p a n e l d e t e r m i n e d t h a t Respondent was obta ined t o r e p r e s e n t a c l i e n t i n a r e a l e s t a t e ma t t e r bu t f a i l e d t o t a k e a c t i o n on h i s c l i e n t ' s b e h a l f , f a i l e d t o communicate wi th h i s c l i e n t s and f a i l e d t o r e t u r n t h e documents reques ted by h i s c l i e n t . I n h i s r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of a c l i = n t i n t h e Juven i l e Div is ion of t h e Wayne County Probate Court , Respondent f a i l e d t o appear f o r a scheduled hea r ing and f a i l e d t o communicate w i t h h i s c l i e n t . Respondent f a i l e d t o s eek h i s c l i e n t ' s l e g a l o b j e c t i v e s i n a d ivo rce mat te r and ignored repea ted demands f o r payment of t h e p u b l i c a t i o n f e e i n t h a t case. Respondent f a i l e d t o answer fou r Requests f o r I n v e s t i g a t i o n and t h e Formal Complaint. H i s conduct was found t o be i n v i o l a t i o n of MCR 9.104(1-4,7); MCR 9.103(C); MCR 9.113(B)(2) and Canons 1, 6 and 7 of t h e Code of P ro fe s s iona l Respons ib i l i t y , DR 1-102(A)(1,5,6); DR 6-101(A)(3) and DR 7-101(A)(1-3).

The panel noted Respondent's p r i o r reprimands f o r misconduct i n 1985 and 1987. Respondent is suspended f o r one yea r and d i r e c t e d t o r e t u r n a l l papers and documents d e l i v e r e d t o him by t h e complainants. Costs were a s se s sed i n t h e amount o f $200.86.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.