Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS HON. MARTIN M. DOCTOROFF CHAIRMAN TOBERT S. HARRISON VICE CHAIRMAN

"HARLES C. VINCENT, M.D. SECRETARY REMONA A. GREEN HANLEY M. GURWIN PATRICK J. KEATING ODESSA KOMER

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 6

GENERAL COUNSEL --

SUITE 1260 333 W . FORT STREET DETROIT. MICHIGAN 48226

Area Code 313 963-5553

NOTICE OF REVOCATION ADB 6-87; 17-87 O f f i e T. A . Rashed, P 33618, 15429 Oakf ie ld S t r e e t , D e t r o i t , M I 48227 b y At torney D i s c i p l i n e Board Wayne County Hearing Panel

# lo .

1 ) Revocation; 2 ) E f f e c t i v e November 6 , 1987. The Respondent f a i l e d t o answer the Formal Complaint and f a i l e d t o appear a t t he scheduled hear ing . The Panel concluded t h a t t he misconduct charged i n the Complaint was e s t a b l i s h e d , t o w i t ; t h a t Respondent was consul ted i n September 1983 w i t h r e g a r d t o a n appea l i n a c r imina l mat te r b u t f a i l e d t o t ake any a c t i o n , f a i l e d t o communicate w i t h t he p o t e n t i a l c l i e n t and f a i l e d t o r e t u r n the t r a n s c r i p t s and documents p e r t a i n i n g t o the a p p e a l ; t h a t he f a i l e d t o f i l e a t imely b r i e f on beha l f of a c l i e n t i n a

s e p a r a t e criminal appea l ; t h a t he f a i l e d t o comply w i t h t he terms

of a n Orde r o f P r o b a t i o n f i l e d March 2 0 , 1985 i n a p r i o r d i s c i p l i n a r y proceeding; t h a t he f a i l e d t o answer three Requests f o r I n v e s t i g a t i o n s e rved i n March 1985, February 1986 and March 1986. Respondent 's conduct was found t o b e i n v i o l a t i o n of MCR 9.104(1-4,7,8); MCR 9.113, MCR 9.121(C)(4) and Canons 1 , 6 , & 7 of t he Code of F?ofessional R e s p o n s i b i l i t y , DR 102 ( A ) (1,5-6) ; DR 6-101(A)(3) and DR 7-101(A)(2,3). Cos ts were a s se s sed i n t h e amount of $165.57.

NOTE: Respondent 's l i c e n s e t o p r a c t i c e law was suspended A p r i l 11, 1986 f o r a p e r i o d of 120 days. Respondent d i d n o t f i l e a P e t i t i o n f o r Reins ta tement i n accordance w i t h MCR

9.123(B) and

Respondent' 8 l i c e n s e was suspended u n t i l t h e e f f e c t i v e d a t e of f Revoca t i on .

John F . / ~ a n ~ tb l

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.