MEMBERS HON. MARTIN M. DOCTOROFF CHAIRMAN
R,OBERT S. HARRISON VICE CHAIRMAN >HARLES C. VINCENT, M.D. SECRETARY REMONA A. GREEN HANLEY M. GURWIH PATRICK J. KEATING ODESSA KOMER
STATE OF MICHIGAN
JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 6 GENERAL COUNSEL
SUITE 1260 333 W . FORT STREET DETROIT. MICHIGAN 48226
Area Code 313 963.5553
NOTICE OF SUSPENSION ADB 32-87; Wayne L. Yashinsky, P 22615, 24655 Sou th f i e ld Road, S u i t e 208, S o u t h f i e l d , M I 48075 b y Attorney D i s c i p l i n e Board Wayne County Hearing Panel #3. 1 ) Suspension - 30 days;
50-87
2 ) E f f e c t i v e October 1, 1987. The Respondent f a i l e d t o answer Formal Complaints s e rved b y the Grievance Adminis t ra tor on March 24 , 1987 and May 5 , 1987. Based upon the Respondent 's d e f a u l t f o r f a i l u r e t o answer, t he a l l e g a t i o n s were taken a s admi t ted and t h e Panel concluded that
the charges of p r o f e s s i o n a l misconduct were e s t a b l i s h e d , t o w i t , t h e Responden t was r e t a i n e d o n May 2 8 , 1982 t o p r o s e c u t e a n insurance c la ims b u t that the Complaint which he f i l e d on A p r i l 19, 1985 a g a i n s t t h e insurance company was dismissed f o r Respondent 's f a i l u r e t o s e rve the Complaint on t he defendant ; that the Respondent f a i l e d t o communicate adequate ly w i t h h i s c l i e n t r ega rd ing the s t a t u s of t he case ; that he f a i l e d t o t u r n over h i s c l i e n t ' s f i l e i n a t imely manner; and that he f a i l e d t o answer Formal Complaints f i l e d b y the G r ievance Adminis t r a t o r . Respondent's conduct was found t o b e i n v i o l a t i o n -o f MCR 9.104(1-4, & 7) and Canons 1 ,2 ,6 , & 7 of t h e Code of P r o f e s s i o n a l Respons ib i l i t y , DR 1 - 1 0 2 ~ 1 , 5 , 6 ; DR 2 - 1 1 0 ( ~ ) ( 2 ) ; DR 6 - 1 0 1 ( ~ ) ( 3 ) and DR 7-101(A)(l-3). Cos ts were a s s e s s e d i n t he amount of $305.55.
I n a n Order f i l e d September 11, 1987, the A t to rney D i s c i p l i n e Board g r a n t e d the Grievance Admin i s t r a to r ' s Motion t o D i s m i s s the Respondent' s P e t i t i o n f o r Review f o r Respondent' s
f a i l u r e td f l e a n a p p e l l a t e b r i e f as ordered b y the Board.
John F. VanBol t