Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DER WIELE CHAIRPERSON REV. MICHAEL MURRAY VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR. LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTIONISTISECRETARY

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT WITH CONDITIONS Case No. 17-57-RP Notice Issued: August 23,2018 Daniel L. Mercier, P 72620, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, by Attorney Discipline Board TriĀ­ County Hearing Panel #80.

Reinstated, Effective August 23, 2018. Petitioner was suspended from the practice of law in Michigan for a period of three years, effective April 15, 2013. His petition for reinstatement, filed in accordance with MeR 9.123(B) and MCR 9.124, was granted by Tri-County Hearing Panel #80. The panel concluded that petitioner satisfactorily established his eligibility for reinstatement in accordance with the guidelines of those court rules. On January 22, 2018, the panel issued its Order of Eligibility for Reinstatement With Conditions. On June 19, 2018, the Board received the required written documentation that petitioner paid his dues with the State Bar of Michigan. On August 21, 2018, the Board received the required written documentation that respondent had been recertified by the State of Michigan Board of Law Examiners and proof of petitioner's compliance with certain other conditions imposed in the panel's order of eligibility for reinstatement with conditions.

The Board issued an order reinstating petitioner to the practice of law in Michigan with conditions, effe~~23' 2018.

en y A. N ley Deputy Direc or

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.