Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS HON. MARTIN M. DOCTOROFF CHAIRMAN

SOBERT S. HARRISON VICE CHAIRMAN 3HARLES C. VINCENT. M.D. SECRETARY

REMONA A. GREEN HANLEY M. GURWIN PATRICK J. KEATING ODESSA KOMER

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOHN F. VAN 61 EXECUTIVE DIRECTC GENERAL COUNS

SUITE 1260 333 W. FORT STRE DETROIT. MICHIGAN

Area Code 313 963.:

NOTICE OF REVOCATION ADB Case No. 37-87; 51-87 Bruce B. Keidan, P 15794, 29181 T i f f any Drive, S o u t h f i e l d , M I 48034 by Attorney D i s c i p l i n e Board Wayne County Hearing Panel lM4.

1 Revocation; 2 ) E f f e c t i v e J u l y 10, 1987. T h e Responden t f a i l e d t o answer t h e t h i r ty-one c o u n t Complaint f i l e d March 20 , 1987 and the subsequent Complaint f i l e d A p r i l 1 7 , 1987 . R e s p o n d e n t d i d n o t a p p e a r a t t h e s c h e d u l e d hea r ing and the Hearing Panel found that the a l l e g a t i o n s were

admi t ted b y d e f a u l t . The misconduct charged i n t he conso l ida t ed complaints included Respondent' s f a i l u r e t o seek the l e g a l o b j e c t i v e s of seven d i f f e r e n t c l i e n t s i n v a r i o u s d ivorce , custody o r c r imina l matters; h i s f a i l u r e t o r e t u r n documents and unearned f e e s t o those c l i e n t s ; h i s p r e s e n t a t i o n of a non-suf f ic ien t funds check drawn on h i s c l i e n t t r u s t account ; h i s f a l s e o r mis lead ing answers t o Requests f o r Inves t i g a t i on ; h i s v i o l a t i o n of va r ious p rov i s ions of a p r i o r Order of Suspension; and h i s f a i l u r e t o answer a Formal Complaint. Respondent 's conduct was found t o b e v i o l a t i o n of M C R 9.104(1-8); MCR 9 . 1 1 3 ( ~ ) ; MCR 9.119; and MCR 9 .128 and Canons 1 , 2 , 6 & 7 of t h e Code o f P r o f e s s i o n a l Respons ib i l i t y , DR 1 - 1 2 ( ~ ) ( 1 , 3 - 6 ) ; DR 2-110(A) (2 ,3 ) ; DR 6-101(A)(3); DR 7-101(A)(l-3). Cos ts were a s s e s s e d i n t he amount of $164.15.

NOTE: Respondent ' s l i c e n s e t o p r a c t i c e law was suspended f o r a pe r iod of three yea r s and one day e f f e c t i v e March 24, 1986. Tha t suspension remained i n e f f e c t u n t i l the e f f e c t i v e d a t e of the

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.