Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

Richard J. hhlr, P 10338, 264 C.&r Stroot, Box 539, Lapoor, H I 49446 by A t t o r m y Dirc ip l ior l b u d Port tlliroa t l u r i a g P a d .

2 ) Cffoct iro Aogurt 4, 1987. Tha h8poad.nt faL1.d to aarurr -0 F o d C olplaint8 a d f a i l o d to appoar a t tin h u r i a g . 'fb. had concludad th t th.

d l a g a t l o n r of misconduct w r o do-d to bo admitted upon t J n o n t r f of Rorpondant 'r d o f a u l t . t o w i t , t h a t Rorpondont w.8 appointed to roproroat a c l i e n t i n porecoavic t ioa procoodi-8 b u t fa i lod to f i l o aay p l u d i l y r or puform any 0tb.r aorr icar on tho c l i a a t ' r bolmlf, t h t h f a i l ed t o actmuor tb. Rmquart f o r I a e r t i p t i o a r u v o d on Sopt-u 15, 1986 and t h t b. f a i l ed t o aluwor tho Formal Complaint r u v a d on Hay 5, 1987. Th b u i a g

Pa& aoted tb aggramt iag o f foc t of B.8poadontWr prior d i r c i p l i m r y hir torf c o a r i r t i a g of r o p r i u n d r Lo tho year8 1970

aad 1979 and rorpowioaa of thfrty and ainoty &ye i n 1975 and 1981 rarpectirmly. Rarpoadant i r rubjoct to tin requirement of

mP 9.123(11) and 9.124 tht b a p p u r boforo a hoariry p a d t o o . r t a 8 b l i r h ; h i 8 e ; l i g i b i l i t y f o r r o i n r t a t o m a a t by c l e a r and convinc in# er idonco. ( Cos t @ r uoro a r r a r r e d f n tha amouat of $116.73. 7 ; u

' c John /P. VanSol t

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.