Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS MARTIN M. DOCTOROFF CHAIRMAN ROBERT S. HARRISON 'ICE CHAIRMAN

iARLES C. VINCENT. M.D. SECRETARY

REMONA A. GREEN HANLEY M. GURWIN PATRICK J. KEATING ODESSA KOMER

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR L -

SUITE 1260 333 W M A T STREET

DETilOlT. MICHIGAN 48226

Area Code 313 963-5553

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND F i l e No. DP 123185 Gary B. P e r k i n s , P 18787, 131 Market S t r e e t , M t . Clemens, M I 48046 by the At to rney D i s c i p l i n e Board ( H a r t i n M. D o c t o r o f f ,

C h a r l e s C. Vincent , M.D., Remona A . Green, Rober t S. Hanley M. Gurwin, P a t r i c k J . ~ e a t i n g )D ecreas ing Oakland County Hear ing Pane l t 1 5 ' s Order o f Suspension.

H a r r i s o n ,

I ) Reprimand; 2 ) E f f e c t i v e February 24, 1937. The Hear ing P a n e l found t h a t t h e R e spondent cornmi t t e d p r o f e s s i o n a l m i s c o n d u c t i n h i s h a n d l i n g o f a w r o n g f u l d e a t h a c t i o n and subsequent p r o b a t e proceedings a s the r e s u l t o f a c t s o r omiss ions which i n c l u d e d h i s f a i l u r e t o reduce h i s con t ingency f e e agreement to w r i t i n g i n v i o l a t i o n o f M C R 8.121(F) [ f o r m e r GCR 928.61 ; h i s d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e wrongful d e a t h proceeds w i t h o u t p r i o r c o u r t a p p r o v a l ; and h i s f a i l u r e t o conc lude t h e p r o b a t e p roceed ings i n a t i m e l y manner. The Hear iong P a n e l concluded t h a t Respondent ' s conduc t w a s i n v i o l a t i o n o f MCR 9.104(1-4), MCR

9 . 1 2 1 ( F ) a n d Canons 1 , 6 6 7 o f t h e Code o f P r o f e s s i o n a l R e s p o n s i b i l i t y 7- lOl(A)( l -3) .

DR

1 - 1 0 1 ) ( 5 , 6 ) ,

DR

6-101(A)(l-3)

and

DR

The t h i r t y day s u s p e n s i o n imposed by t h e Hear ing P a n e l was a p p e a l e d t o the At to rney D i s c i p l i n e which a f f i r m e d the P a n e l ' s f a c t u a l f i n d i n g s b u t reduced d i s c i p l i n e t o a Reprimand. C o s t s were- a s p e s s e d i n t h e amount o f 5G04.22.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.