Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS LOUANN VAN DER WIELE CHAIRPERSON REV. MICHAEL MURRAY VICE-CHAIRPERSON BARBARA WILLIAMS FORNEY SECRETARY JAMES A. FINK JOHN W. INHULSEN

JONATHAN E. LAUDERBACH KAREN D. O'DONOGHUE MICHAEL B. RIZIK, JR. LINDA S. HOTCHKISS, MD

STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

211 WEST FORT STREET, SUITE 1410

DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3236 PHONE: 313-963-5553 I FAX: 313-963-5571

MARK A. ARMITAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

WENDY A. NEELEY DEPUTY DIRECTOR

KAREN M. DALEY ASSOCIATE COUNSEL

SHERRY L. MIFSUD OFFICE ADMINISTRA TOR

ALLYSON M. PLOURDE CASE MANAGER

OWEN R. MONTGOMERY CASE MANAGER

JULIE M. LOISELLE RECEPTION/STISECRETARY

www.adbmich.org

NOTICE OF REPRIMAND WITH CONDITION (By Consent)

Case No. 18-26-RD Notice Issued: June 14, 2018 Juliann Karenko, P 42532, Kemah, Texas, by the Attorney Discipline Board Tri-County Hearing Panel #28.

Reprimand, Effective June 14, 2018. In a reciprocal discipline proceeding under MCR 9.120(C), the Grievance Administratorfiled a certified copy of an order suspending respondent's license to practice law in Florida for a period of ten days, entered by the Supreme Court of Florida, effective December 16, 2017, The Florida Bar v Juliann K. Karenko, Case No. SC17-857.

An order regarding imposition of reciprocal discipline was served upon respondent on March 14,2018. The parties objected and Tri-County Hearing Panel #28 was assigned to consider the matter. Respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Discipline, in accordance with MCR 9.11S(F)(S), which was approved by the Attorney Grievance Commission and accepted by the hearing panel.

The stipulation contained respondent's admissions that she was disciplined for professional misconduct in the State of Florida. Based on the parties' stipulation and MCR 9.120(C)(1), the panel found that respondent's misconduct was established and that, as comparable discipline, respondent be reprimanded and subject to a condition relevant to the established misconduct. Costs were assessed in the amount of $757.41.

/~~{)~ Mark A. Armitage Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.