Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEM%RS HON. MARTIN M. DOCTOROFF CHAIRMAN

@BERT S. HARRISON mOUUUA(N .HARLES C. VINCENT, M.D. SECRETARY

REMONA A. GREEN HANLEY M. GURWIN PATRICK J. KEATING ODESSA KOMER

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOHN F. VAN BOLT MECUTM OIRECKM 6 GENERAL CCUhSL

SUITE 1 2 0 333 W mS TREET MTROIT. MICHIGAN 4f3220

Area Cod. 313 -5555

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION F i l e No. DP 110186; DP 167186 John H. Kelly, P 25567, 3620 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, HI 49008 by Attorney Disc ip l ine Board B a t t l e Creek Hearing Panel. 1 ) Suspension - 60 days;

2 ) Ef fec t ive January 21, 1987. The Respondent f a i l e d t o f i l e a n answer t o the f i v e count Formal Complai n t f i l e d b y t h e Gr ievance Adminis t r a t o r . The Complaint charged t h a t Respondent was r e t a i n e d i n October 1985 t o i n s t i a t e divorce proceedings and accepted a r e t a i n e r of $2 50.00 f o r t h a t purpose b u t t h a t he f a i l e d t o take a c t i o n , f a i l e d t o communicate wi th h i s c l i e n t and f a i l e d t o r e l i n q u i s h the f i l e t o

s u b s t i t u t e counsel; that he f a l s e l y represented t o h i s c l i e n t that divorce proceedings had been i n s t i t u t e d b u t that the documents had b e e n . l o s t b y t h e C o u r t ; t h a t he had f a i l e d t o comply wi th the term's of the previous d i s c i p l i n e order regarding

the payment of cos ta t o the S t a t e Bar of Michigan; and that he had f a i l e d t o answer two Requests f o r Inves t iga t ion . Respondent

was found to have committed a c t s of profess ional misconduct i n v i o l a t i o n of MCR 9.104(1-4,7,8); MCR 9.113; MCR 9.128; and Canons 1,6 & 7 of the Code of Profess ional Responsib i l i ty , DR 1-102 (A)(4-6); DR 6-101(A)2,3); and DR 7-101(A)(1,3).

The Respondent appeared be fo re the hearing panel and was a f f o r d e d a n o p p o r t u n i t y t o p r e s e n t t e s t i m o n y i n m i t i g a t i o n . Costs were asseased i n the amount of $260.52.

T h e PetiJi-on f o r Review f i l e d b y t h e Respondent was dismissed a s moot on the e n t r y of an Order dated August 5, 1987 revoking Respondent' s l i c e n s e to p r a c t i c e law r e t r o a c t i v e l y t o

February 10, 1987.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.