Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

u(wem u & R r l ~ K C T O R O F F M

> M U A N ROBERT S HAARISON rrCd r3UtnUAN

{ARLES C VINCENT M 0 ume rrnv REMONA A GREEN HANLEY M CURWIN PITRICK J KWTING ODESSA KOMER

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOHN F VAN BOLT EXECUrlVE >#RECTOR 6

GENEFLA -L CO UNSEL

SUITE :2 m

IU W FORT STREET DETROIT MICHIGAN 48226

NOTICE OF INCREASED SUSPENSION F i l e Nos. DP 82/86; DP 149/86 John C. Houradian, P 18040, 285 Whims Court , Roches ter , M I 48063 by a n Order of the Attorney D i s c i p l i n e Board, i nc reas ing suspension of 120 days imposed by Oakland County Hearing Panel #lo. 1 ) Suspension 180 days;

2 ) E f fec t ive October 31, 1986. Respondent 's l i c e n s e to p r a c t i c e law was suspended f o r a p e r i o d o f 120 days upon t h e f i n d i n g by a h e a r i n g p a n e l t h a t Responden t f a i l e d t o t a k e a c t i o n on b e h a l f o f a c l i e n t i n a c r imina l ca se , f a i l e d to r e p l y to h i s c l i e n t ' s w r i t t e n i n q u i r i e s , f a i l e d t o answer a Request f o r I n v e s t i g a t i o n and f a i l e d to answer the Formal Complaint. ( s e e Notice of Suspension dated December 12, 1986)

The P e t i t i o n f o r Review f i l e d by the Grievance Administrator urged t h a t the d i s c i p l i n e be increased i n l i g h t of Respondent' s p r i o r d i s c i p l i n a r y h i s tory . Noting a c o n s i s t e n t p a t t e r n of appa ren t i n d i f f e r e n c e to h i s r e s p o n s i b i l i t y to comply wi th the r u l e s governing d i s c i p l i n a r y proceedings, i nc lud ing Respondent's f a i l u r e to answer ten Formal Complaints, the Board i n c r e a s e d d i s c i p l i n e t o a s u s p e n s i o n o f 180 days and u n t i l f u r t h e r order of the Supreme Court , the Di sc ip l ine Board o r a H e a r i n g P a n e l . Review c o s t s were a s s e s s e d i n t h e amount of $82.40.,pespondent's Motion f o r Reconsidera t ion was denied March

D 1

1te d. .

MAR 3 7 lEFm

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.