Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS MARTIN M WCTOROFF CHARIMAN ROBERT S HARRISON

VICE CHAIRMAN CHARLES C. VINCENT. M D SECRETARY

REMONA A GREEN HANLEY M GURWIN PATRICK J KEATING ODESSA KOMER

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOHN F VAN BOLT ExEcurlvE DIRECTOR I

GENERAL COUNSEL -

SUITE 1260 333 W FORT STREET DETROIT MICHIGAN 48226

Atea Cwe 313 963 5553

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION F i l e Nos. DP 82/86; DP 149186 John C. Houradian, P 18040, 285 Whims Cour t , Roches ter , M I 48063 by At torney D i s c i p l i n e Board Oakland County Hearing Pane l 810.

1 ) Suspens ion - 120 days;

2) E f f e c t i v e October 31, 1986. The Respondent f a i l e d to answer t he two Formal Complaint f i l e d by the Grievance Admin i s t r a to r and conso l ida t ed f o r hear ing . The Pane l found that the D e f a u l t s c o n s t i t u t e d admiss ions by the Respondent t h a t the cha rges o f misconduct were t r u e and that the Respondent f a i l e d t o t ake any a c t i o n on h i s c l i e n t ' s behalf i n h i s c a p a c i t y a s a c o u r t appo in t ed a p p e l l a t e c o u n s e l i n a c r i m i n a l c a s e , t h a t h e f a i l e d t o r e p l y t o h i s c l i e n t ' s w r i t t e n r e q u e s t s c o n c e r n i n g t h e s ta t u s o f t h e pos t

c o n v i c t i o n proceedings , t h a t he f a i l e d t o answer t he Reques t f o r I n v e s t i g a t i o n which was f i l e d by the c l i e n t and s e w e d by the Gr ievance Adminis t ra tor and t h a t he f a i l e d to answer the Formal Complaint. Xespondent 's conduct xa s found t o be i n v i o l a t i o n o f MCR 9.104(1-4 & 7 ) ; MCR 9.113(A) and Canons 1 , 6 & 7 of the Code of P r o f e s s i o n a l R e s p o n s i b i l i t y , t o w i t : DR 1-102(b)(4-6); DR 6-iOl(A)(3) and DR 7 - 1 0 1 ( ~ ) ( B ) . Cos t s were a s s e s s e d by the Panel in the amount o f $137.67.

The Hearing Pane l cons idered Respondent' s s ta ternen ts 1n m i t i g a t i o n presented a t the hea r ing t oge the r w i t h ev idence thn t R e s p o n d e n t had b e e n t h e s u b j e c t o f n i n e p r e v i o u s C o m p l a i n t s r e s u l t i n g i n two Reprimands and t h r e e suspensions. The suspens ion imposed by the Hearing Pane l w i l l remain i n e f f e c t u n t i l Respondent has e s t a b l i s h e d h i s e l i g f b i l i t y f o r r e i n s t a t e m e n t i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h MCR 9 . 1 2 4 . The G r i e v a n c e Adminis t ra tor has f i l e d a P e t i t i o n f o r Review w h i c h i s pending be fo re the At torney D i s c i p l i n e Board. dQb Johp P. VanBolt

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.