Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS MARTIN M DOCTOROFF CHAIRMAN m R OBERT S HARRISON VICE CHAIRMAN CHARLES C VINCENT M D SECRETARY

REVONA A GiiEEY UihILEV M CJPWIN PbTP C< J K.EA?IYG C 3 E t F r .\GME?

STATE OF MICHIGAN

Bi~cigIinp

JOHN F VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 8

GENERAL COUNSEL SUITE 1260 333 W FORT STREET DETROIT MICHIGAN 482.

Area Coae 3:; 963.5553

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION F i l e No. DP 80186; DP 117186 Leonard S t r i c k l a n d , P25031, 3011 E. Grand Boulevard, D e t r o i t , M I 48202 by the Attorney D i s c i p l i n e Board Wayne County Hearing Panel #5.

(1 ) Suspension - 120 days; (2) E f f e c t i v e December 23, 1986. The Respondent, a suspended a t t o r n e y , d id n o t appear a t the hear ing . The Hearing Panel determined tha t Responden t' s

Defau l t f o r F a i l u r e to Answer the Formal Complaint cons ti t u ted and admission to those charges t h a t Respondent had f a i l e d t o

comply wi th a p r i o r Order of D i s c i p l i n e regarding the reimbursement of c o s t s i n the amount of $122.97 and that the Respondent had f a i l e d to answer a Request f o r I n v e s t i g a t i o n served by the Grievance Administrator i n March 1985. Respondent was found t o be i n v i o l a t i o n of HCR 9 .104(1 ) (4 ) (7 ) ; HCR 9.113(A); M C R 9 .I28 and Canon 1 of the Code of P r o f e s s i o n a l ? .espons ib i l i tp DR 1-102(X)(1)(5!(5!. Costs were as ses sed i n the amount of $157.813.

The Respondent was suspended from the p r a c t i c e of law f o r a per iod of n ine months e f f e c t i v e September 3 , 1985, F i l e No. DP 187184. A three-year suspension became e f f e c t i v e May 27, 1986 i n F i l e s DP 88/85; DP 110/85 and DP 17/85. Respondent has been suspended cont inuously s i n c e September 3 , 1985 and w i l l be e l i g i b l e to f i l e a p e t i t i o n f o r r e in s t a t emen t i n accordance wi th MCR 9.123(B) no e a r l i e r than May 27, 1989. The 120-day n e l i n t h i s c a s e runs concurren t ly suspensions.

-

Dated : I

. . .--

.

. . . .

. -

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.