Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

MEMBERS PATRICK J. KEATING CHAIRMAN MARTIN M. DOCTOROFF VICE CHAIRMAN 2HARLES C. VINCENT. M.D. SECRETARY REMONA A. GREEN HANLEY M. GURWIN ROBERT S. HARRISON ODESSA KOMER

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JOHN F. VAN BOLT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR d

GENERAL COUNSEL

SUITE 1260 333 W. FORT STREET DETROIT. MICHIGAN 48226

Area Code 313 963.5553

e I C E O F REVOCATION (By Consent)

F i l e No. DP 47/86 Jona than Miller, P 25907, 23777 Greenfield Road, Su i t e 488, Southfield, M I 48075 by Attorney Disc ipl ine Board Oakland County Hearing Panel #16.

(1) Revocation; (2) Effect ive J u l y 14, 1986. The Formal Complaint f i l e d by the Grievance Administrator a l leged that the Respondent represented a c l i e n t i n the sale of her home and, a s her a t to rney , received the n e t proceeds of the s a l e , i n the amount of $45,261.35. The Complaint charged t h a t the Respondent f a i l e d t o promptly de l ive r those funds to h i s c l i e n t , a s requested by her, i n v io la t ion of MCR 9.104(4) and the

Code of Professional Responsibil i ty, Canon 9 DR 9-102(B)(4).

I n a S t i p u l a t i o n f o r Consent Order of Discipl ine f i l e d by the Respondent and the Grievance Administrator under the provisionsof M C X 9.115 (F) ( 5 ) , Respondent Miller offered h i s plea of nolo contendere to the a l l ega t ions contained i n the Formal Comolaint and s t i p u l a t e d to the en t ry of an Order Revoking H i s ~ i c e n s et o p r a c t i c e Law, e f f e c t i v e ~ ; 14l, ~1986 . The order of Revocat ion e n t e r e d by t h e Hearing P a n e l a d o p t s the f u r t h e r s t i p u l a t i o n of the p a r t i e s tha t before Respondent may f i l e any P e t i t i o n f o r Reinstatement, he must make f u l l r e s t i t u t i o n , with i n t e r e s t , of any sums owed by reason of any profess ional misconduct, notwithstanding any Order of Discharge which may be entered by the United S t a t e s Bankruptcy Court. The p a r t i e s a l s o agreed t h a t another pending Formal Complaint aga ins t the Respondent would be dismissed. Costs were assessed i n the amount of $1231.71.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.