Notices

Decision Information

Decision Content

STATE OF MICHIGAN Attorney Discipline Board

2022-Jan-06

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Attorney Grievance Commission,

Petitioner, v GARY D. NITZKIN, P 41155, Respondent. _____________________________/

Case No. 18-19-GA

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Issued by Attorney Discipline Board 333 W. Fort St., Detroit, Michigan 48226

On August 6, 2020, Tri-County Hearing Panel #69 entered an order of suspension and restitution with condition that suspended respondent’s license to practice law in Michigan for 90 days, effective August 28, 2020. Respondent filed a timely petition for review and petition for stay, which resulted in an automatic stay of the hearing panel's August 6, 2020 order in accordance with MCR 9.115(K). After review proceedings held in accordance with MCR 9.118, the Board issued an order on April 27, 2021, that affirmed the hearing panel’s order of suspension and restitution with condition in its entirety, and ordered additional restitution. On May 25, 2021, respondent filed a motion for reconsideration which resulted in an automatic stay of the Board’s order, pursuant to MCR 9.118(E). On August 24, 2021, the Board issued an order denying respondent’s motion for reconsideration. As a result, the Board’s order of suspension and restitution with condition and ordering additional restitution became effective on September 22, 2021.

On December 29, 2021, respondent, Gary D. Nitzkin, submitted an affidavit pursuant to MCR 9.123(A), stating that he has fully complied with all requirements of the Board’s order. No objection to respondent’s affidavit was received from the Grievance Administrator within the seven days set forth in MCR 9.123(A); and the Board being otherwise advised;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Gary D. Nitzkin, is REINSTATED to the practice of law in Michigan effective January 6, 2022.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD

Dated: January 6, 2022

By:

/s/ Mark A. Armitage Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.